To: UriÂ’el-2012
This was in response to the replier who said that it was ‘impossible’ for God to have Jesus as the first Subject in verse 27a, and antichrist as the subject in verse 27b.
I simply pointed to the previuous vers (26) to show him that God does indeed do that.
Hence, he was proved wrong again.
To: Iggles Phan
Is English your first language ? It does not appear to be so.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach 376 posted on
11/30/2011 5:56:12 PM PST by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: Iggles Phan; metmom; GiovannaNicoletta
If my thoughts and communciations were mangled about 26a vs 26b, please note post #320.
What I'm most fiercely protesting is
YOUR mangling of the Daniel 9 verses to insist that verse 26 b is still talking about the Messiah; the Anointed one when it is clearly talking about the END TIMES and the Anti-Christ.
Insisting that the Anti-Christ spoken of in the last part of v26 is Jesus the Messiah, is one of the most blasphemous things I've ever read on here.
403 posted on
11/30/2011 8:14:33 PM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Iggles Phan
Is the world moving toward a NWO, one world government, one world religion, one world economy?
424 posted on
12/01/2011 2:32:22 AM PST by
marbren
(I do not know but, Thank God, God knows)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson