Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HossB86
You conflated sola scriptura with Dispensationalism.

No I didn't. I used it as an example. Two very similar teachings, both sola scriptura, that end in one determining the other is from Satan. Based on their sola scriptura interpretation.

This is an example that sola scriptura is ultimately not based on the same authority, else it would not result in this example. I could have used other examples.

it's a subset that doesn't cause issue among Protestants as it relates to salvation

Certainly it does. It says Paul's Gospel is different from Christ's (except that it teaches Christ said follow Paul's). The whole point is that Paul teaches a different soteriology than Christ's Kingdom of God.

And examples are found in other sola scriptura branches, the salvation by election branch vs. the others for example.

964 posted on 11/28/2011 5:33:06 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr
Certainly it does.

Actually... no. A Protestant who believes in Dispensationalism will not dispute with someone who is not a Dispensationalist on how one is SAVED -- by faith alone through Christ alone... they may argue about the rapture as to whether or not it's pre-trib, post-trib etc. -- but the issue of saving faith is common.

Sorry if I wasn't clear.

Hoss

992 posted on 11/28/2011 6:17:35 PM PST by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson