Are you now suggesting you actually read St. Peter Damian's Book and have some knowledge of what it contains or is this like your earlier post on reason in which you are merely cutting and pasting, summarizing and concluding from others (poor) scholarship?
While we are on that subject do you care to explain the plagiarism I pointed out?
Subjects are for changing when pursued beyond stolen snippets. Then it's Wack A Mole Time! Leaving reason and logic behind quickly rather than engage in coherent debate seems to be the nonCatholic Apologist's primary tool on this thread.