Your quote from page 160 does not appear on page 160.
Your quote from page 80 mixes the section title with the text.
Your quote from pages 82-83 leaves out the most important part: Then she will certainly pray her Son that he may pardon thee
Your quote from page 169 does not appear on page 169. It however in part quotes Justinian but as a statement and not as a question.
Your quote from pages 180-181 does not appear on those pages.
I would suggest that perhaps in the future that you read the actual source material rather than quoting antiCatholic websites without even acknowledging them. The quotes are taken out of context or simply made up.
Jvette already posted that she found the exact stuff from caww’s post on an anti-Catholic website, with the exact same elipses and punctuation. Clearly cut and pasted.
So it is not surprising that you have found that caww’s anti-Catholic website has several inaccurate quote just in those few sections. Heaven forbid there should be more examples. That’s why it is impossible to trust anything they post here.
Thanks for going to the trouble. Anyone lurking can see what was done. I’m not accusing anyone of lying, but for heaven’s sake, can’t the anti-Catholics just admit what they are? It’s like they’re ashamed of themselves...
Mark...that is not the source of where I got the information. Though I’m sure other sites have used the compilation as well.
But again....read the book...it’s avaiable on line so that you can read in full context which was your question to begin with.
Amazingly you yourself have not provided even a “snippet “ of the quotes used in order to defend what you’re saying...and yet your require from others the entire context....so post the ones you are referencing Mark and we can go from there.