Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rzman21
Romans and Luther's translation of it provide a good example of the mold for sola scriptura:
I know very well that in Romans 3 the word solum is not in the Greek or Latin text – the papists did not have to teach me that. It is fact that the letters s-o-l-a are not there…

Please do not give these donkeys [papists] any other answer to their useless braying about the word sola than simply this: “Luther will have it so, and he says that he is a doctor above all the doctors of the pope.”
Luther's Open Letter on Translating


1,667 posted on 11/30/2011 12:20:44 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]


Placemarker


1,668 posted on 11/30/2011 12:31:40 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1667 | View Replies ]

To: D-fendr

Protestants are hypocrites when they protest papal infallibility or ecclesiastical infallibility for that matter because they implicitly declare their individual infallibility when it comes to interpreting scripture.

Individual fathers or doctors may err, but a matter is only infallible if it is a matter of universal consent like the real presence, the Divinity of Christ, etc.

It’s like the difference between a soloist and an orchestra.

The soloist is fallible while the orchestra is infallible. That’s the best analogy for describing catholicity.

The individual Protestant who reads his or her Bible is like a soloist.


1,670 posted on 11/30/2011 12:39:49 PM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1667 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson