Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg
Evidently Paul didn’t get the message since he expressed to Timothy his desires the prayers and supplications be made and thanks be given for all men.

FOR all men. Not TO all men.

558 posted on 11/02/2011 6:15:46 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Allow me to suggest considering the argument BEFORE starting the attempt at refutation.

You say that we should follow Jesus in our prayer and cite the Lord's Prayer and gratuitously ask what happened to "Do whatever he tells you."

So, I see NOTHING in the Lord's prayer about making prayers and supplications or giving thanks for all men. (This argument has nothing to do with the intercession of the saints. It has to do with how closely bound we are to the Lord's Prayer.) It would SEEM that Paul is asking for something NOT in the Lord's prayer.

Therefore it seems that Paul disagrees with you about the manner in which the Lord's Prayer serves as a model. The Lord's Prayer has no explicitly intercessory parts, yet Paul wants people to make intercessory prayers.

So I say "Evidently Paul didn’t get the message...".

The question of "FOR" or "TO" is utterly irrelevant to the point being made. It is shucking and jiving, laying down smoke, changing the subject, ANYTHING but responding to the argument.

If the best your side can do is change the subject, then how strong are your arguments? Really.

592 posted on 11/02/2011 9:24:59 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson