So when the assertion of that inability was made, I thought it would bear examining. But in response to my request mostly what I have received is answers to some other questions or references to the state of the dead before Christ rose and mounted on high taking captivity captive.
I don't know what the problem is, but I DO know that there IS a problem here. They are laying down smoke between us and the original assertion, as though distraction were a valid dialectical technique.
My reaction to many of the proof texts is 'So, it's like Christ never happened?'
They are laying down smoke between us and the original assertion, as though distraction were a valid dialectical technique.
Occasionally a linear cogent debate is enjoined for a brief while, until it gets close to some resolution when a new 'distraction' is thrown out, then boilerplate assertions usually with a nice dollop of slander.
A few days later the same issue is approached, as if the previous debate never happened. Memory hole. Rinse and repeat.
Perhaps some new information is gained by lurkers and readers, but the handful repeating the same answered or refuted accusations over and over... doubtful, at least from the evidence here.