[CynicalBear]

>> So then you really aren’t arguing that the books are inspired. You are arguing that people should accept the books that the want to accept.<<

I’m “arguing” that if a book or writing contains information or concepts that disagrees with or is in opposition to the 66 books it can’t be considered inspired. Sola Scriptura simply states that all doctrine or practices agree with and can be justified by scripture.

[BenKenobi]

So why should your list of 66 books be considered “scripture”? That’s my point. There has to be an objective standard. It can’t just be, “use whichever books you like.

Now if you are arguing that it is self-evident that scripture is the 66 books, I want to hear why.