[metmom]

You can't recall them because they do not exist

Couldn't see that one coming....

But here, for the skeptics and unbelievers......

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2571185/posts?page=173#173 .

Also post 180, 181.

And this.....http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2649950/posts?page=25#25, and also post 62.

And this thread..... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2649950/posts?page=25#25 , and also posts 193, 283, 334, 556, and no doubt more.

And last but not least this very thread itself in post 27, post 55 (yours pt).

At worst, you've been told "Biblical silence is not denial."

Because some people seem to think that that gives them license to make up stuff they want to hear and claim it's *truth* based on *tradition* rather than any solid evidence.

[Religion Moderator]

Do not spread arguments from thread to thread.

[CynicalBear]

Oh, that was precious!

[smvoice]

Great post, mm. This is one to be referred to often..

[papertyger]

Because some people seem to think that that gives them license to make up stuff they want to hear and claim it's *truth* based on *tradition* rather than any solid evidence.

On what basis do you attack the legitimacy of claiming "silence" is not "denial?"