[boatbums]

So any discrepancy is not your fault, but some other mythical poster’s error? It seems that impeaching your sources is fruitful, when one is searching for 1 your meaning and 2 the truthe I certainly hope that everyone reading this thread will go to the links given and follow them to their sources. Those so-called “Bible studies” appear to be something else entirely at times.

I thought you weren't responding to me anymore. I guess you couldn't pass up an opportunity to gang dump, could you? Hopefully, you have read the subsequent posts and see that there really was no discrepancy only one of your gang's inability to look at the OTHER chapter that was also given as the source. That's chapter XIX, or 19 for the unlearned. There is even an online link to read it for yourself, since none of my comments measure up to the "impeccable" research so many of your friends demonstrate. The link is http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18438/18438-h/18438-h.htm#19

[Natural Law]

"That's chapter XIX, or 19 for the unlearned."

Please stop with this charade. Continuing to suggest that you were posting from the original material and from within the context and intent as the authors intended is as dishonest as presenting them dishonestly in the first place. You ran with unverified information because you seemingly wanted it to be true.

Please see post #3580 for details.