[metmom]

My assertion is that "history" science does not refute either the Deuterocanonicals or Exodus, but you are demanding that you get to choose when history science trumps Scripture and when it does not. You need to pick a story and stick to it.

There, fixed it for YOU.

[CynicalBear]

Science has never shown scripture to be in error. On the contrary, in every case it has shown it to be correct.

[Natural Law]

"There, fixed it for YOU."

Perhaps you should go back and read the thread and then repost in a more contextual and honest manner. There was a refutation of the Deuterocanonical Books because there was some "historical" information apparently at odds within them. I pointed out that that was not a valid standard because there is some "historical" information at odds with Exodus and Genesis that I similarly reject.