Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
THAT is your Church. Exactly. Declaring what they want to be doctrine as LITERAL. And rejecting as "vague" or not literal the things in the CC that would blow a hole big enough to drive the Pope mobile straight out of Rome. In a hurry. The RCC takes the parts of the Bible they can USE. Period. The rest is not to be taken "literally".

a stuffed flounder? It's much better than sour grapes, D-...

3,496 posted on 11/22/2011 7:44:51 PM PST by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing is for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3492 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice

And that post just fits nowhere in either of your previous discussion, except as yet another assertion and accusation. Were I to respond on any point, no doubt more confusion, deflection and rote accusations would result. Not a good use of my time, much as you might enjoy the opportunity.

I enjoy a good argument well argued, coherent, honestly and passionately engaged.

You don’t offer that.

Adios.


3,499 posted on 11/22/2011 7:55:23 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3496 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson