To: CynicalBear
"Promoting books with errors like the following doesn’t add to confidence in the truthfulness of Christianity." Then you similarly reject the books of Genesis and Exodus because of conflicting scientific and archaeological evidence or are you content that are right, just not yet proven scientifically?
3,430 posted on
11/22/2011 2:29:24 PM PST by
Natural Law
(If you love the Catholic Church raise your hands, if not raise your standards.)
To: Natural Law
>>Then you similarly reject the books of Genesis and Exodus because of conflicting scientific and archaeological evidence<<
Prove it.
To: D-fendr; Natural Law; CynicalBear
Uh-oh, D-. You better check out this post 3430 that Natural Law posted to Cynical Bear. Your Catholic Bible Study may in interested in this, since you’re studying Genesis right now...
3,432 posted on
11/22/2011 2:47:22 PM PST by
smvoice
(Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing is for an eternity..)
To: Natural Law; CynicalBear
This is what happens when one rejects the authority and reliability of Scripture; science becomes the standard by which Scripture is measured as if science is truth.
3,479 posted on
11/22/2011 7:05:51 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson