Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Judith Anne
>>What is your problem with that?<<

The problem is the inability to refute the message. Regardless of the messenger if the message cannot be refuted attacking the messenger only reveals the probability that the message is correct.

>>Obama objects to Catholic hospitals being pro-life, and not providing abortion services by their employees. Is that your problem too?<<

LOL Trying to change the subject again? Totally unconnected to the discussion of this thread.

3,375 posted on 11/22/2011 6:51:01 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3373 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
The problem is the inability to refute the message. Regardless of the messenger if the message cannot be refuted attacking the messenger only reveals the probability that the message is correct

Oh, please. No such probability. The fact that I do not pretend, as some here do, to be a scholar, does not mean that the internet doctorates are correct. Plenty of evidence has been offered on both sides. I notice that the usual suspects simply either 1, ignore other viewpoints, or 2, quote anti-Catholic sources as authoritative, which they are not. Consensus does not equal accuracy. Look at the Global warming idiots.

3,379 posted on 11/22/2011 7:01:42 AM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson