Attacking the messenger again rather then addressing the message? How about addressing the message and refuting that? This is getting very, very old. You still haven’t addressed the proof shown that the CC demands adherence to its doctrines and rules. Can you refute the proof that those books contain error or is this another dodge?
Yes, I attack anti-Catholic messengers. What is your problem with that? There are a couple of articles today about Obama attacking freedom of religion in the Catholic Church, I suppose that’s okay with you?
Obama objects to Catholic hospitals being pro-life, and not providing abortion services by their employees. Is that your problem too?
Proof that those books contain error. THAT should be the rule. If you want to level an accusation, you should have to show PROOF that your accusation is valid. If not, then SHUT UP. PROVE the books contain error. Compare it with the CC teachings and you SHOULD be able to PROVE if a book is in error or not. But guess what, the books will be proven RIGHT, and I think the would-be book burners KNOW it. What they’re looking for is a big bonfire of books they reject, so they can have a weinie roast and s’mores. There must be some kind of saint for campfires day coming up soon.