Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
Still it would clearly obvious from the very fact that they had to “debate the matter” that there had been no clear consensus up until that time and debate or differing with the “decision” was not an option after that time for fear of reprimand or excommunication.

Yes. Just as for the Judaizers after Acts 15. That seems to be the way it works.

334 posted on 11/01/2011 6:30:36 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg
Yes. Just as for the Judaizers after Acts 15. That seems to be the way it works.

The Church did tend to let believers be believers until a bunch of them headed off to heretical land and then called a Council to try to define things. The charge comes up against the Church, but I think that it reflects more on human nature and the deviations that humans can invent.

453 posted on 11/01/2011 5:48:47 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson