So now you are attempting to scare the RM into believing that my posts, which are adequately acknowledged and credited, ACCORDING TO THE RM, will result in “the equivalent of a banned site”? You don’t seem to get it. The RM gave his/her approval of my sources. I will always give my sources. If I did not, that would be a problem. Insanity, I tell you, pure insanity with wailing and gnashing. In order to keep the message from the forefront. I am asking you one more time: prove it or shut up about it. I have received the only approval I need: the RM’s. If that changes, then we will take it from there. In the meantime, if you don’t like my posts, or my acknowledgments and credits given, don’t read them, or find a way to refute the message. It’s not the sources you despise, it’s the message.
smvoice, perhaps D-fendr missed the RM’s instructions here at this post (link provided).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2799123/posts?page=3155#3155
RM:”smvoice’s source information was adequate.
Leave copyright investigation up to the moderators. To avoid flamewars like this in the future, if you question the source, let me know by Freepmail.”
I'm directing you to the Forum Rules, pointing out their obvious intent concerning banned sites as you talk about what you intend to do with "loads of posts" and how you think you will do so while conforming to the forum rules.
The RM doesn't scare, certain not by me, nor is he/she easily fooled.
Now I think to continue this further would be making it too personal.