THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT RM. I gave the source, the page numbers, the volume number, the Canon number, the section number. I DID NOT GO TO A WEBSITE TO GET THE INFORMATION. AM I SUPPOSED TO RESEARCH EVERY WEBSITE BEFORE POSTING INFORMATION THAT IS LISTED IN THE RCC CODE OF CANON LAW, OR A CATHOLIC MAGAZINE? I CANNOT GIVE CREDIT TO A WEBSITE THAT I DON’T EVEN KNOW EXISTS. AND IF ONE WEBSITE THAT I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT LINKS TO ANOTHER WEBSITE THAT I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT, please tell me what I’m to do. I’m not yelling at you, RM, I’m YELLING IN GENERAL at the IMPOSSIBILITY of researching unknown websites so Judith Anne doesn’t come across them when she is seemingly researching forbidden websites. I will do as you say, but I CANNOT RESEARCH SOMETHING THAT I KNOW NOTHING OF.
When I googled the first line of your quote:
Each individual must receive the faith and law from the Church..with unquestioning submission and obedience of the intellect and the will..We have no right to ask reason of the Church, any more than Almighty God..
Those are the first two sites that came up, a forbidden one, jesus-is-savior.com and the other one, which is copyrighted.
So your yelling excuse is kind of lame...difficult to believe. as it were...
Well, if it makes the RCC look bad it must not be allowed to stand.
I hope it is obvious that there are some here who will object to everything that puts their sacred tradition in any light but stellar, but will pull out all stops to do nothing BUT heap insults and criticism on anyone else's. I wouldn't let it bother me if I were you, but consider the history of those who try to muffle anything negative EVEN when it comes from their OWN sources.