Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Judith Anne; Religion Moderator

THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT RM. I gave the source, the page numbers, the volume number, the Canon number, the section number. I DID NOT GO TO A WEBSITE TO GET THE INFORMATION. AM I SUPPOSED TO RESEARCH EVERY WEBSITE BEFORE POSTING INFORMATION THAT IS LISTED IN THE RCC CODE OF CANON LAW, OR A CATHOLIC MAGAZINE? I CANNOT GIVE CREDIT TO A WEBSITE THAT I DON’T EVEN KNOW EXISTS. AND IF ONE WEBSITE THAT I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT LINKS TO ANOTHER WEBSITE THAT I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT, please tell me what I’m to do. I’m not yelling at you, RM, I’m YELLING IN GENERAL at the IMPOSSIBILITY of researching unknown websites so Judith Anne doesn’t come across them when she is seemingly researching forbidden websites. I will do as you say, but I CANNOT RESEARCH SOMETHING THAT I KNOW NOTHING OF.


3,032 posted on 11/20/2011 3:06:12 PM PST by smvoice ("What, compare Scripture with Scripture?..We'll have to double the Magisterium...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3029 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice; Religion Moderator

When I googled the first line of your quote:

Each individual must receive the faith and law from the Church..with unquestioning submission and obedience of the intellect and the will..We have no right to ask reason of the Church, any more than Almighty God..

Those are the first two sites that came up, a forbidden one, jesus-is-savior.com and the other one, which is copyrighted.

So your yelling excuse is kind of lame...difficult to believe. as it were...


3,035 posted on 11/20/2011 3:12:52 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3032 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice

Well, if it makes the RCC look bad it must not be allowed to stand.


3,042 posted on 11/20/2011 3:18:04 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3032 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice
Not in any attempt to play Moderator here, but you have a very legitimate point, smvoice. You did exactly what is required when you posted the source INCLUDING the page number. What cracks me up sometimes, is we get criticized when we post links from the Internet - mockingly calling it the "Googlesterium" - and not from real "books", implying we only do research from the net unlike "real" students. But then when we post references from "real" books, there are those who do Googlesterium searches and then insist we got the info from the first link that pops up, as if they were the ONLY sources!

I hope it is obvious that there are some here who will object to everything that puts their sacred tradition in any light but stellar, but will pull out all stops to do nothing BUT heap insults and criticism on anyone else's. I wouldn't let it bother me if I were you, but consider the history of those who try to muffle anything negative EVEN when it comes from their OWN sources.

3,187 posted on 11/20/2011 10:38:10 PM PST by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us. Titus 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3032 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson