Replies

Matthew 27:37
Above his head they placed the written charge against him: THIS IS JESUS, THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Mark 15:26
The written notice of the charge against him read: THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Luke 23:38
There was a written notice above him, which read: THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.

John 19:19
Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS.

John 19:20-22
"This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin. Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews. Pilate answered, What I have written I have written."

I agree with Natural Law about this, the Gospel writers wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit and as he brought to their remembrance all those things Jesus taught them. That the description of the inscription over the cross isn't precisely, EXACTLY the same, only proves that they didn't huddle together so they could “get their stories straight” but spoke as God led them and also that this doesn't prove that Scripture has errors in it. Each of the accounts still say the same thing. Too often, enemies of the Christian faith seek to find whatever little pebble or stone they can find to toss at our divinely inspired Scriptures to try to chip away at any of our foundations for the faith. God's word will never pass away. His truth endures forever and he has given us a great gift whereby we can be assured of the authority of the revealed truths that uphold us.

And let’s not forget that the Jews didn’t want it to say that He was the King of the Jews, they wanted a qualifier.

They wanted it to say that “He said” he was the King of the Jews.

But, the truth was there for all to see.

Beautiful

I agree with Natural Law about this, the Gospel writers wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit and as he brought to their remembrance all those things Jesus taught them. That the description of the inscription over the cross isn't precisely, EXACTLY the same, only proves that they didn't huddle together so they could “get their stories straight” but spoke as God led them and also that this doesn't prove that Scripture has errors in it. Each of the accounts still say the same thing.

Overall I agree. I am just making the point that the Bibliolaters who worship the book over God are wrong. The book is fallible. It is the interpretation of the Church, going back to the Apostles that is not.

God's word will never pass away. His truth endures forever and he has given us a great gift whereby we can be assured of the authority of the revealed truths that uphold us.

I'm good with that.