You really have a problem with those who have come out of your Church, don't you? It's like they may be saying things that the RCC doesn't want told...Ex-priests, ex-nuns, ex-members, they all tell the same stories. And it ain't pretty. SO, who to believe? The RCC whose history is filled with forged, false documents in which RCC doctrine still exists to this day, papal intrigue, concordats with EVIL, torture of "heretics", anathemas issued but never rescinded to those who do not bend their knees to Rome, pagan rites, rituals, prayers to the dead, another Jesus, another gospel, deceit, threats of excommunication, twisting of Scripture, adding to and taking from Scripture, hiding truth and destroying those who dare to speak it, and just general deception of epic proportion. OR, people who have left, whether it be because they were actually searching for the truth, or because they dared to question authority and were similarily dismissed. Gee, which sounds more believeable? God's Word answers that question.
But please, keep posting your outrage at those who dare to tell. It just gives more post time to explain what it is they are telling. And WHY it is so important, especially at this time. They are whistleblowers for these days of deceit and deceivers. Come out of her while there is still time.
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
>>>>>>But please, keep posting your outrage at those who dare to tell. It just gives more post time to explain what it is they are telling. And WHY it is so important, especially at this time. They are whistleblowers for these days of deceit and deceivers. Come out of her while there is still time.
One sentence from Vicars pf Christ: “Promiscuity was rife in monasteries and convents. The great Ivo of Chartres (1040-1115) tells of whole convents with inmates who were nuns only in name. They had often been abandoned by their families and were really prostitutes.”
And wehre did you copy and paste this paragraph from?:
>>>> It’s like they may be saying things that the RCC doesn’t want told...Ex-priests, ex-nuns, ex-members, they all tell the same stories. And it ain’t pretty. SO, who to believe? The RCC whose history is filled with forged, false documents in which RCC doctrine still exists to this day, papal intrigue, concordats with EVIL, torture of “heretics”, anathemas issued but never rescinded to those who do not bend their knees to Rome, pagan rites, rituals, prayers to the dead, another Jesus, another gospel, deceit, threats of excommunication, twisting of Scripture, adding to and taking from Scripture, hiding truth and destroying those who dare to speak it, and just general deception of epic proportion. OR, people who have left, whether it be because they were actually searching for the truth, or because they dared to question authority and were similarily dismissed. Gee, which sounds more believeable? God’s Word answers that question.
Actually my problem is with those who lie about actually having been in the Church and repeatedly portray the most outlandish lies as Catholic doctrine. I don't have to make the post about any individual Freepers. The liars know who they are as do those of us who really do know Catholic doctrine.