Perhaps you did not read the credit to the author. Look again, or give me the post number and I’ll look at it for you. “Which cannot be authenticated?” BWHAHAHAH! NOTHING your Church SAYS can be “authenticated”. From fraudulent writings contributed to the early Church Fathers, to varying and disagreeing statements and “histories” of popes and their decrees, excommunicating each other, concordats with EVIL, and persecution of all who do not bend the knee to Rome. It’s ALL one big fraud. You’ll look in vain for a truthful exegis on the Catholic Church. Unless you look at former Catholics who have come forward with the “truth” of your Church. But then, you won’t believe them, will you? They are Church “heretics” and “anathema”. That leaves a real conundrum. Challenge away, it’s one institution’s lies against former member’s testimonies. You choose which to believe. You all take at face value what is presented to you as truth. The Scriptures are not searched to “see if those things were so”. They are just accepted as “fact” by the “faithful”. That’s not my problem. That’s RCC members problem. It seems. Good luck
I read the credit to the author, what I did not see is from where the author got the quote; the original writing of Pelagius in which he said that.
I have googled it several times and there is not one single hit on a source other than this author.
That is what I mean by authenticated.
Give me the original attribution to Pope Pelagius, an official document wherein he says this.
If you cannot, then retract it.
Otherwise, it is exactly as I said, the quote was meant to defame not edify.