Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

I presume he doesn’t regard maccabees as scriptural. I could be wrong about that...


26 posted on 10/28/2011 1:38:44 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi
Well, smvoice would be correct in that according to the RCC. Up until the Reformation the Apocryphal books were not part of the canon. The Apocryphal "writings were not officially declared to be divinely inspired, and included in the Catholic canon of Scripture as such, until 1546 at the Council of Trent.

I’m currently studying that whole deal and am finding some rather compelling reason they were not part of cannon. It seems there are many problems fitting them with other scripture.

29 posted on 10/28/2011 2:21:44 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson