Replies

To: D-fendr; metmom; CynicalBear

Well, didn't you just break my heart. First YOU ASK ME questions about dispensationalism, then when I answer your question, you dismiss it as if I had knocked on YOUR door to hand out a bible tract. And actually, you seem very much a scriptural illiterate. One cannot be Scripturally intelligent and a follower of the RCC. They don't match, if you haven't noticed. The truth is a total stranger to you, if you met it, you would turn around and run to the nearest Mass for a wafer and a sip. To make you feel better and all.

Your religion is much older than mine. Yours began in Genesis Chapter 3, was enlarged in Gen. Chapter 10, and has grown steadily since then. I don't think you could ever discern truth from a lie. The truth IS a lie to your religion. So continue the facade of knowing God's Word, and be smug in your "knowledge" of Christ's teachings, and God's plan for man. You've cast your lot, but there are those who have not, yet. Those are the ones who need to hear the truth. Not the RCCs "version of the truth." There is a difference.

2,343 posted on 11/15/2011 6:22:58 PM PST by smvoice ("The tongue is a fire...and it is set on fire of Hell." I believe Ivo of Chatre would agree.)

First YOU ASK ME questions about dispensationalism

I'm sorry. I thought that in the context of the discussion it was clear I was asking you to tell others, particularly nonCatholics, all about it and convert them. I thought my opinion of your teachers and my view of their religion was quite clear.

You've cast your lot, but there are those who have not, yet. Those are the ones who need to hear the truth.

That's what I'm talkin' 'bout. Have at 'em.

I'm still waiting to hear if Metmom is going to be a good prospect for you or is already down with Darby.

Your religion is much older than mine.

I think that comes under 'damning with faint praise' since there's very very few that aren't:

2,346 posted on 11/15/2011 6:34:17 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)

To: smvoice; metmom

Ah, here it is, in the post your reply was to, I was addressing Metmom:

SmVoice can tell you all about it, right smvoice?

2,352 posted on 11/15/2011 6:45:25 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)

To: smvoice; D-fendr; metmom

>>Yours began in Genesis Chapter 3, was enlarged in Gen. Chapter 10, and has grown steadily since then.<<

I’m thinking Nimrod, Semiramus, and Tammuz.We see Tammuz again in Jeremiah.

2,359 posted on 11/15/2011 7:03:41 PM PST by CynicalBear

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794