I guess you would not want to, unless you were a Christian.
Care to describe what YOU consider the "real gospel of Jesus Christ"?
BTW, one wonders if the fact that the thread article "Mark 400th Anniversary of King James Version by Studying Bible" was from Thomas Monson escaped your notice?
Well, ya got me! I'm an Islamormchristohinddist!!
The King James version is known to be fraught with errors, misinterpretations and incorrect translations of Aramaic, rewriting parts the way King James thought they should be, removing some books and adding in others, and flat out making stuff up to coincide with his version of Jesus' life.
That's why it call it celebrating 400 years of fiction. He muddied the water by "guilding a lily", if you will, and obscuring the truth about our Lord and Savior.