To: metmom; MarkBsnr
I don’t know but I was rather hoping I might learn why Paul’s writings are viewed with such a jaundiced eye by some of the posters here.
648 posted on
09/05/2011 10:03:41 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
I was rather hoping I might learn why Paul’s writings are viewed with such a jaundiced eye by some of the posters here. IMHO it is about the replacement theology problem. Paul is the main apostle for the Church, Christ believing Jews and gentiles. Once the church age, the age of grace, is over with the rapture, God's program shifts back to Israel.
654 posted on
09/05/2011 10:11:06 AM PDT by
marbren
(I do not know but, Thank God, God knows)
To: count-your-change
I don’t know but I was rather hoping I might learn why Paul’s writings are viewed with such a jaundiced eye by some of the posters here. Because, as Peter tells us, Paul's writings are difficult to understand. They may be (and often are) used to concoct nonChristian doctrines and antiChristian beliefs.
There is nothing wrong with Paul. There is everything wrong with Paulicians.
681 posted on
09/05/2011 10:49:02 AM PDT by
MarkBsnr
(I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move m to do so.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson