Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool; Mad Dawg
"The Blessed Virgin Mary is to be called Queen not only on account of her divine motherhood but also because by the will of God she had a great part in the work of our salvation...In this work of redemption the blessed Virgin Mary was closely associated with her Christ..Just as Christ, because he redeemed us, is by a special title our King and Lord, so too is Blessed Mary, our Queen and our Mistress, because of the unique way in which she co-operated in our redemption. She provided her very substance for his body, she offered him willingly for us, and she took a unique part in our salvation by desiring it, praying for it, and so obtaining it..."- Ad Coeli Reginam. Pope Pius XII.

Now call me suspicious, but that sounds an awful lot like Co-redeemer, meaning Co-operating in our redemption and by praying for our salvation, obtaining our salvation. Not a "with", but an "equal". That's my opinion, anyway.

1,952 posted on 09/08/2011 9:25:36 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1926 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice

That is how it reads.

Now, whether it means what it says is simply a matter of the allegiance of the person to whom you’re talking.


1,955 posted on 09/08/2011 9:31:38 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice
the unique way in which she co-operated in our redemption.
(1)She provided her very substance for his body,
(2) she offered him willingly for us,
(3)and she took a unique part in our salvation by
(3a) desiring it, (3b) praying for it, and so (3c) obtaining it..."

Again, we take Col 1:24 to imply that there IS a way that we can co-operate or contribute to Christ's redemptive work. I think THAT's the humongo theological hurdle/disagreement. For MOI, once we can accept what I take Col 1:24 to suggest, Mary's contribution seems evident.

Is that clearer? I'm not asking if you agree (ho ho ho), I'm asking if you 'get' the claim and the manner of its making.

1,958 posted on 09/08/2011 9:42:58 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (In my Father's trailer park are many double-wides. (apologies to Iscool))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice
Now call me suspicious, but that sounds an awful lot like Co-redeemer, meaning Co-operating in our redemption and by praying for our salvation, obtaining our salvation. Not a "with", but an "equal". That's my opinion, anyway.

I agree...

"The Blessed Virgin Mary is to be called Queen not only on account of her divine motherhood but also because by the will of God she had a great part in the work of our salvation...

If Jesus however, had been accepted by the Jews as their Messiah, we Gentiles as Christians wouldn't exist...And that would have been Mary's fault as well...

So why wasn't Mary hung on a cross beside Jesus...

So if that's true with Mary, it must be true with every Mother concering her children...If your son goes to jail, you go with him...

2,012 posted on 09/08/2011 1:09:00 PM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson