No you didn't. You were extremely vague about what you claimed. Your whole approach has been to throw out bits and pieces without giving full sources for any of it, apparently hoping that the sheer volume of the bits and pieces will make it look like your position is solid, when it is not.
Now John, you shouldn't make such claims that are so easily refuted. Here is one example of source citation:
("The Letter of the Prophet, Joseph Smith to Miss Nancy Rigdon," Joseph Smith Collection, LDS archives; History of The Church 5:134-36. Sidney Rigdon Biography, Richard S. Van Wagoner, Chapter 21) - three locations for the same statement of history.
If you go back, you'll see I've provided documentation for my other citations too. I'll assume on this point that you are ignorant of citation methodology John. Please don't make the same mistake twice.