There is no "logic of that", since "that" is not what I responded to. I responded to your statement about worship. There was no mention of a King or his feet in the statement I was responding to.
You answered, "but I'm not a Presbyterian". What sense does that make?
Perfect sense since I'm not Presbyterian.
What have you done but substitute from near the very beginning of this conversation?
I believe it was you that tried to change the statement to which I was responding. Are you now denying that?
You know, like claiming I was laughing "at their teachings" when it was your footnote that was found humorous.
My "footnote" was about their teachings. I don't think they're funny.
You've twice now shifted my words into what you must have wished I had said.
I didn't "wish" anything. I responded to what you posted. But you did try to make it look like I was responding to something I wasn't.
You speak of respect, but give none while expecting plenty.
Don't let your imagination get the best of you, now and confuse me with yourself.
Keep twisting things to justify your own prejudices
The twisting was all of your own doing, but I can understand why you would want to try to divert the accusation over to someone else.
you'll find your own comeuppance
Your empty threats mean nothing to me.
Listen, I apologize if your feelings have been hurt, but keep in mind that open threads are for the grownups. You might fare better on the caucus or ecumenical threads.
You’re still not making any sense. I give up.