Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr; dangus; madison10
The purpose was to link the full document - which refutes most if not all of the questions on this thread; to note the novelty of your theory among early Christians, and to borrow the Doctor’s comments apropos same.

I have no theory, novel or otherwise. I simply quoted Jerome.

Your argument is with Jerome and/or the accuracy of the document "Against Helvidius".

Is it possible to limit the scope of this discussion to the accuracy of the quote in question? Smoke bombs are useful in combat, not this discussion.

904 posted on 06/22/2011 6:46:46 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
Your argument is with Jerome

What? Your theory that James was the blood brother of Jesus is the same theory as Helvidius, which St. Jerome refutes.

914 posted on 06/22/2011 9:22:34 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson