Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD

Jesus’ instructions to John to take care of Mary, as his mother, upon his crucifixion seem to imply that Mary had no other children.

Also... with 5 children in on the discipleship game with Jesus. How is there no role for Joseph, their father on earth, in their formation and ministry?


47 posted on 06/13/2011 4:58:59 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rwilson99
Jesus’ instructions to John to take care of Mary, as his mother, upon his crucifixion seem to imply that Mary had no other children.

Isn't there a more straightforward explanation? None of his brothers believed in Him and were not at the crucifixion, John WAS there.

174 posted on 06/14/2011 7:00:34 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: rwilson99
Jesus’ instructions to John to take care of Mary, as his mother, upon his crucifixion seem to imply that Mary had no other children.

It implies that her other children were NOT the eldest son. It was Jesus' position as the eldest in the Jewish home to take care of His mother. Most likely He had John do it because 1) John was a nephew of Mary's 2)Jesus' brothers, who thought Jesus a nut, had scattered to the four winds & did not yet believe in Him as the Christ -- see James and Jude; therefore, Jesus was not going to leave Mary's care to them. We don't know how much younger they were than Jesus, there could have been sisters in between.

710 posted on 06/20/2011 7:36:23 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson