[HossB86]

By that logic

Metmom - that's the problem; there is NO logic that could come close to validating their claim that "prayer is communicating."

Praying is praying, no matter how they try to explain it. Praying to anyone other than God Almighty is idolatry. And blasphemy.

Hoss

[papertyger]

I'm so happy you're comfortable in that tiny box of yours.

And speaking of logic, are you familiar with the term “gratuitous assertion?”

You should be, because by definition a gratuitous assertion like “there is no logic that could come close to validating their claim...” may be just as gratuitously denied. And should be, when the ersatz logician is claiming something as asinine as the immutability of word usages.

[papertyger]

BTW...you should look up the definition of “blasphemy” before you use it, much less acc-use it.

[Quix]

It seems to me . . .

That if they canNOT have their DAFFYNITIONARY,

Their whole house of cards collapses. Therefore, they MUST

persist in INSITING, !DEMANDING! to USE THEIR DAFFYNITIONARY and some THROW A HUGE HISSY FIT CONTINUING TO USE IT!

Sheesh! I never realized before how much like the JW and Mormon Cults the Vatican Cult is on such scores.