Yes, one of the most misquoted of the Jewish scriptures. Psalm 110 has nothing to do with Jesus. The KJV butchers the Hebrew in 110 to make it appear to be about Jesus.
From Messiah Truth:
His first coming was as a Lamb, sacrificial, his second coming will be as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. The kingly tribe (lion). Which is what we see in Revelation chapter five, Christ as both Lamb and Lion. A great revelation, no doubt, to the early Jewish church: Lamb = the first coming, Lion = the second coming.
The Hebrew scriptures simply do not teach this anywhere. This notion is created by the church through mistranslation and pure eisegesis of the text.
Human sacrifice is forbidden, human vicarious atonement is forbidden, Jesus did not die on the altar, did not die of sudden blood loss at the neck, he suffocated. His ofal and fat were not burned. In everyway imaginal...he was not an acceptable sacrifice. The sacrifical god-man for sin is purely a grecco-roman concept.
The 3rd temple will be built, the priesthood restored, sacrifices are returning forever, mashiach will be a noraml man who will live and die and pass the throne of David to other Kings forever. The gentiles will come to Jerusalem to learn of G-d and his law. Isaiah 2:3
I see, blasater a 21st century Jew knows more about these Messianic issues than the early 1st century Jews. Which Jews to believe? They lived two thousand years closer to these Messianic events than you. You are just a Johnny come lately.
I’m sure the early Jewish Christians were aware of the criticisms you bring up, yet they rejected your notions choosing Jesus Christ. Your notions are nothing new, antichrists, both Jew and Gentile, have used them for centuries.