Smacktard should have posted it here first.
Doing otherwise is pimping for blog hits.
Do you view FR as a blog advertising medium? Particularly for those who fail to donate?
Why? Should contributors to Canada Free Press or Mark Steyn have to do that as well?
Doing otherwise is pimping for blog hits.
The author does not own or publish the Catholic National Register. He isn't gaining financially.
Do you view FR as a blog advertising medium?
No, but even lefties at the New York Times get page views from FR. It's inevitable.
Particularly for those who fail to donate?
I imagine only Jim and John can confirm donation status unless a donor puts himself on the list (that was years ago; not sure if there's a recent one.)
If he works for them then very likely all the articles he writes become their intellectual property. He may also work under contract for them with the understanding that his work becomes their property with them holding and exercising copyright over them.