[count-your-change]

I do enjoy these little bouts of verbal jousting!

My comment: “That must be what’s surprising.” was in response to your #121, so again “that” would refer to what you had said earlier, your charge that I was making “anti-Catholic” posts and the fact of your surprise.

So my comment in my #126 was a suggestion of what must be surprising to you since you proclaimed yourself so. Yes.

Thus it seems you’re asking me to explain what was going on in your mind even though I’ve offered a couple of possibilities of what “that must be..”

You’ve been very diligent about NOT explaining why you charged me with being “anti-Catholic”, so do you care to do so now or do my suggestions fit well enough?

[WPaCon]

I do enjoy these little bouts of verbal jousting!

This isn't verbal jousting. I'm just trying to figure out what you meant.

You’ve been very diligent about NOT explaining why you charged me with being “anti-Catholic”

I was never asked to explain.

I still don't know what you're talking about, and I'm done trying to figure out now.

See ya.