[paladin1_dcs]

I’m not making it personal, I’m challenging his account of events. Logic dictates that those who bring an accusation hold the burden of proof in the matter. He’s provided no proof, therefore his accusations are false until such a time as he provides that proof. There are clearly visible falsehoods in his testimony and I’ve challenged him on those grounds.

[Religion Moderator]

Accusing another Freeper of telling a lie is attributing motive to him, the intent to deceive. It is mind reading.

Telling another Freeper that he has no clue is also mind reading.

And making the thread "about" individual Freepers is also "making it personal."

Ignore the messenger, discuss the message.