Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Church Fathers-Mary: Without Sin
The Church Fathers ^ | 70AD-584AD

Posted on 04/14/2011 9:21:51 AM PDT by marshmallow

The Ascension of Isaiah

“[T]he report concerning the child was noised abroad in Bethlehem. Some said, ‘The Virgin Mary has given birth before she was married two months.’ And many said, ‘She has not given birth; the midwife has not gone up to her, and we heard no cries of pain’” (Ascension of Isaiah 11 [A.D. 70]).

The Odes of Solomon

“So the Virgin became a mother with great mercies. And she labored and bore the Son, but without pain, because it did not occur without purpose. And she did not seek a midwife, because he caused her to give life. She bore as a strong man, with will . . . ” (Odes of Solomon 19 [A.D. 80])

Justin Martyr

“[Jesus] became man by the Virgin so that the course which was taken by disobedience in the beginning through the agency of the serpent might be also the very course by which it would be put down. Eve, a virgin and undefiled, conceived the word of the serpent and bore disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy when the angel Gabriel announced to her the glad tidings that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her and the power of the Most High would overshadow her, for which reason the Holy One being born of her is the Son of God. And she replied ‘Be it done unto me according to your word’ [Luke 1:38]” (Dialogue with Trypho the Jew 100 [A.D. 155]).

Irenaeus

“Consequently, then, Mary the Virgin is found to be obedient, saying, ‘Behold, O Lord, your handmaid; be it done to me according to your word.’ Eve, however, was disobedient, and, when yet a virgin, she did not obey. Just as she, who was then still a virgin although she had Adam for a husband—for in paradise they were both naked but were not ashamed; for, having been created only a short time, they had no understanding of the procreation of children, and it was necessary that they first come to maturity before beginning to multiply—having become disobedient, was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race; so also Mary, betrothed to a man but nevertheless still a virgin, being obedient, was made the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race. . . . Thus, the knot of Eve’s disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. What the virgin Eve had bound in unbelief, the Virgin Mary loosed through faith” (Against Heresies 3:22:24 [A.D. 189]).

“The Lord then was manifestly coming to his own things, and was sustaining them by means of that creation that is supported by himself. He was making a recapitulation of that disobedience that had occurred in connection with a tree, through the obedience that was upon a tree [i.e., the cross]. Furthermore, the original deception was to be done away with—the deception by which that virgin Eve (who was already espoused to a man) was unhappily misled. That this was to be overturned was happily announced through means of the truth by the angel to the Virgin Mary (who was also [espoused] to a man). . . . So if Eve disobeyed God, yet Mary was persuaded to be obedient to God. In this way, the Virgin Mary might become the advocate of the virgin Eve. And thus, as the human race fell into bondage to death by means of a virgin, so it is rescued by a virgin. Virginal disobedience has been balanced in the opposite scale by virginal obedience. For in the same way, the sin of the first created man received amendment by the correction of the First-Begotten” (ibid., 5:19:1 [A.D. 189]).

Tertullian

“And again, lest I depart from my argumentation on the name of Adam: Why is Christ called Adam by the apostle [Paul], if as man he was not of that earthly origin? But even reason defends this conclusion, that God recovered his image and likeness by a procedure similar to that in which he had been robbed of it by the devil. It was while Eve was still a virgin that the word of the devil crept in to erect an edifice of death. Likewise through a virgin the Word of God was introduced to set up a structure of life. Thus what had been laid waste in ruin by this sex was by the same sex reestablished in salvation. Eve had believed the serpent; Mary believed Gabriel. That which the one destroyed by believing, the other, by believing, set straight” (The Flesh of Christ 17:4 [A.D. 210].

Pseudo-Melito

“If therefore it might come to pass by the power of your grace, it has appeared right to us your servants that, as you, having overcome death, do reign in glory, so you should raise up the body of your Mother and take her with you, rejoicing, into heaven. Then said the Savior [Jesus]: ‘Be it done according to your will’” (The Passing of the Virgin 16:2–17 [A.D. 300]).

Ephraim the Syrian

“You alone and your Mother are more beautiful than any others, for there is no blemish in you nor any stains upon your Mother. Who of my children can compare in beauty to these?” (Nisibene Hymns 27:8 [A.D. 361]).

Ambrose of Milan

“Mary’s life should be for you a pictorial image of virginity. Her life is like a mirror reflecting the face of chastity and the form of virtue. Therein you may find a model for your own life . . . showing what to improve, what to imitate, what to hold fast to” (The Virgins 2:2:6 [A.D. 377]).

“The first thing which kindles ardor in learning is the greatness of the teacher. What is greater [to teach by example] than the Mother of God? What more glorious than she whom Glory Itself chose? What more chaste than she who bore a body without contact with another body? For why should I speak of her other virtues? She was a virgin not only in body but also in mind, who stained the sincerity of its disposition by no guile, who was humble in heart, grave in speech, prudent in mind, sparing of words, studious in reading, resting her hope not on uncertain riches, but on the prayer of the poor, intent on work, modest in discourse; wont to seek not man but God as the judge of her thoughts, to injure no one, to have goodwill towards all, to rise up before her elders, not to envy her equals, to avoid boastfulness, to follow reason, to love virtue. When did she pain her parents even by a look? When did she disagree with her neighbors? When did she despise the lowly? When did she avoid the needy?” (ibid., 2:2:7).

“Come, then, and search out your sheep, not through your servants or hired men, but do it yourself. Lift me up bodily and in the flesh, which is fallen in Adam. Lift me up not from Sarah but from Mary, a virgin not only undefiled, but a virgin whom grace had made inviolate, free of every stain of sin” (Commentary on Psalm 118:22–30 [A.D. 387]).

Augustine

“Our Lord . . . was not averse to males, for he took the form of a male, nor to females, for of a female he was born. Besides, there is a great mystery here: that just as death comes to us through a woman, life is born to us through a woman; that the devil, defeated, would be tormented by each nature, feminine and masculine, as he had taken delight in the defection of both” (Christian Combat 22:24 [A.D. 396]).

“That one woman is both mother and virgin, not in spirit only but even in body. In spirit she is mother, not of our head, who is our Savior himself—of whom all, even she herself, are rightly called children of the bridegroom—but plainly she is the mother of us who are his members, because by love she has cooperated so that the faithful, who are the members of that head, might be born in the Church. In body, indeed, she is the Mother of that very head” (Holy Virginity 6:6 [A.D. 401]).

“Having excepted the holy Virgin Mary, concerning whom, on account of the honor of the Lord, I wish to have absolutely no question when treating of sins—for how do we know what abundance of grace for the total overcoming of sin was conferred upon her, who merited to conceive and bear him in whom there was no sin?—so, I say, with the exception of the Virgin, if we could have gathered together all those holy men and women, when they were living here, and had asked them whether they were without sin, what do we suppose would have been their answer?” (Nature and Grace 36:42 [A.D. 415]).

Timothy of Jerusalem

“Therefore the Virgin is immortal to this day, seeing that he who had dwelt in her transported her to the regions of her assumption” (Homily on Simeon and Anna [A.D. 400]).

John the Theologian

“[T]he Lord said to his Mother, ‘Let your heart rejoice and be glad, for every favor and every gift has been given to you from my Father in heaven and from me and from the Holy Spirit. Every soul that calls upon your name shall not be ashamed, but shall find mercy and comfort and support and confidence, both in the world that now is and in that which is to come, in the presence of my Father in the heavens’” (The Falling Asleep of Mary [A.D. 400]).

“And from that time forth all knew that the spotless and precious body had been transferred to paradise” (ibid.).

Gregory of Tours

“The course of this life having been completed by blessed Mary, when now she would be called from the world, all the apostles came together from their various regions to her house. And when they had heard that she was about to be taken from the world, they kept watch together with her. And behold, the Lord Jesus came with his angels, and, taking her soul, he gave it over to the angel Michael and withdrew. At daybreak, however, the apostles took up her body on a bier and placed it in a tomb, and they guarded it, expecting the Lord to come. And behold, again the Lord stood by them; the holy body having been received, he commanded that it be taken in a cloud into paradise, where now, rejoined to the soul, [Mary’s body] rejoices with the Lord’s chosen ones and is in the enjoyment of the good of an eternity that will never end” (Eight Books of Miracles 1:4 [A.D. 584]).

“But Mary, the glorious Mother of Christ, who is believed to be a virgin both before and after she bore him, has, as we said above, been translated into paradise, amid the singing of the angelic choirs, whither the Lord preceded her” (ibid., 1:8).


TOPICS: Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: maryiworshipthee; thereisnonebutthee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 421-424 next last
To: presently no screen name

You (collective not personal) modern day Protestants are the ones who belong to an upstart sect that came up with man made innovations that contradicted the constant witness of the faith. Not Catholics not Orthodox.

Even the Reformers would not recognize your disdain for the Virgin Mary and your denial of her role in the economy os Salvation.


141 posted on 04/14/2011 1:58:16 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
I get the teenage reference -- my father's 89 going on 16 ... Without going into specifics, let's just say he's a handful! I wouldn't exactly say I'm angry with him, but he certainly does try my patience : )
Sinless people do not bring false charges against another person, much less the perfect and sinless Son of God.
I don't understand the meaning here of "false charge." What did Mary say that was false? What did she accuse (charge?) Jesus of? I'm asking this with reference to my curiosity about equating sinlessness with omniscience. If, as the Bible translation explicitly states, Mary did not understand, how could anyhthing that she said be construed as sinful?
142 posted on 04/14/2011 2:08:08 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
You (collective not personal) modern day Protestants

HEY! Watch it - don't put labels on me! I don't care that you say 'collective'! You got it? I BELONG TO JESUS and not a denomination. That's too much of a stretch for catholics to grasp as they are unteachable and unreachable but that's not my problem.

I am a child of The Most High and walk in His blessings daily. Got it? Now you know how to address me - so save the liberal tactic of 'labeling' for your liberal friends!
143 posted on 04/14/2011 2:17:12 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Quix

If Mary thought she was without sin, she wouldn’t have called God her savior because she wouldn’t have needed one.

So by calling God her savior when she never sinned, she lied, which is a sin, which means she DID sin and need a savior.

Catholics just don’t think through what they believe.


144 posted on 04/14/2011 2:46:14 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Who cares what those the Catholic church calls its church fathers may have thought?

Wide is the road and broad is the path that leads to destruction and many there are that find it. Consensus does not make truth.


145 posted on 04/14/2011 2:47:48 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
Even the Reformers would not recognize your disdain for the Virgin Mary and your denial of her role in the economy os Salvation.

See if catholicsm hasn't warped your mind so much you can't get this. I COULD GIVE A FLIP what any 'man' thinks. It's all about JESUS! So take your liberal tactic 'or what others think' - the liberal intimidation tactic - and have it for breakfast! Because conservatives don't eat the poison you are dishing out!

Got it? Mary has NOTHING to do with any salvation. RCC rocks withe liberalism - always pushing propaganda and use any liberal tactic to do it!


146 posted on 04/14/2011 3:17:13 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
You seem to reject the Word of Elohim
and follow the religion of man (i.e. church fathers)

All created beings need a Messiah for salvation.
It is in YHvH's Word.

Repent and seek the face of YHvH.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

147 posted on 04/14/2011 3:21:54 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
One of the main talking points in your posts is "Catholicism = liberalism = socialism = pawn of the Devil" etc.

Thanks for telling me.

I really fail to understand why you feel that is a credible or even useful line of attack.

Attack what?
148 posted on 04/14/2011 3:29:36 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
Oh, you are mistaken. It is a general truth that protestantism causes and perpetuates socialism and Communism.

LOL!! I'll let others laugh at that propaganda from the left!
149 posted on 04/14/2011 3:38:52 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross; paladin1_dcs

Learn how to properly divide The Word and, in the meantime, leave it to those who do. Remaining unteachable is not a conservative trait.


150 posted on 04/14/2011 3:44:23 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
HEY! Watch it - don't put labels on me!

We don't have to.

Matthew 23: 34 18 Therefore, behold, I send to you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and pursue from town to town, 35 so that there may come upon you all the righteous blood shed upon earth, from the righteous blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. 36 Amen, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation. 37 19 "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how many times I yearned to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her young under her wings, but you were unwilling! 38 Behold, your house will be abandoned, desolate. 39 I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.'"

You guys label yourselves with your Pharasiacal opposition to the Church that Jesus created and gave His authority to.

You got it?

Quite adequately.

Matthew 23: 13 7 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites. You lock the kingdom of heaven 8 before human beings. You do not enter yourselves, nor do you allow entrance to those trying to enter.

I BELONG TO JESUS

Matthew 7: 21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, 10 but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name? Did we not drive out demons in your name? Did we not do mighty deeds in your name?' 23 Then I will declare to them solemnly, 'I never knew you. 11 Depart from me, you evildoers.'

Scripture says that those who reject the Church reject the One who sent them.

Luke 10: 16 Whoever listens to you listens to me. Whoever rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me." 17 The seventy (-two) returned rejoicing, and said, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us because of your name."

I believe that you are very vocal about rejecting the Church.

I am a child of The Most High and walk in His blessings daily.

You keep saying that and you keep showing that you aren't. Why the disconnect?

Matthew 7: 15 9 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves. 16 By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Just so, every good tree bears good fruit, and a rotten tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So by their fruits you will know them.

You are well known on the RF.

151 posted on 04/14/2011 3:44:41 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
I COULD GIVE A FLIP what any 'man' thinks. It's all about JESUS!

Odd. Your posts are full of 1) yourself and 2) how anti Catholic you are.

Mark 8: 34 He summoned the crowd with his disciples and said 8 to them, "Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me. 35 For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and that of the gospel 9 will save it. 36 What profit is there for one to gain the whole world and forfeit his life? 37 What could one give in exchange for his life? 38 Whoever is ashamed of me and of my words in this faithless and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of when he comes in his Father's glory with the holy angels."

Your posts indicate that you are more attached to handing out crosses than to carrying them. I also notice a singular paucity of Gospel in your prose - whereas we bring the Gospel to the heretic, the apostate, the pagan and the ungrateful. You're welcome.

152 posted on 04/14/2011 3:48:56 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I am not trying to be flippant here but do you understand the term economy of salvation as opposed to Salvation? Salvation does indeed rest in Christ alone. But Mary certainly played a very important role in the economy of salvation. Which is God’s plan on how Christ would come to save us. He came to us through the womb of the Virgin and became man.

It is not my fault that so many sects, perhaps yours is amongst them, seem to have no trouble just jettisoning the faith of 1500 years for a hodge podge of beliefs made to appeal to those who can not be bothered to examine what has been believed by the majority of Christians since the age of the Apostles. In that you are the Liberals.


153 posted on 04/14/2011 3:51:18 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
"Remaining unteachable is not a conservative trait."

So you are saying conservatives should bent and change with the times? Change their values with the times? How is that a conservative trait?

"LOL!! I'll let others laugh at that propaganda from the left!"

I was wondering what your reaction would be; truth be told, I essentially took what you said about Catholicism and changed it to protestantism to see your reaction to your own words.

154 posted on 04/14/2011 3:54:49 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
>>>Attack what?<<<

Come now, let us not play dumb.

155 posted on 04/14/2011 3:56:30 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I used the term Protestant because that is the term widely used to describe those who follow Reformed Christianity and its offshoots. It does not describe a specific denomination. I will not address you as Child of The Most High as really that is a bit long. Not sure if you are saying you don’t belong to any sect. Would Reformed believer suit you?


156 posted on 04/14/2011 3:57:36 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

Ah history, readily available for all yet rarely given much thought.


157 posted on 04/14/2011 4:00:00 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Left one out: Martin Luther "But the other conception, namely the infusion of the soul, it is piously and suitably believed, was without any sin, so that while the soul was being infused, she would at the same time be cleansed from original sin and adorned with the gifts of God to receive the holy soul thus infused. And thus, in the very moment in which she began to live, she was without all sin..." And you are leaving out the fact that Martin Luther was at one time a Roman Catholic priest. Takes a while for people to get rid of all the unbiblical teachings they have been taught . Martin Luther did not come out of Babylon far enough
158 posted on 04/14/2011 4:00:24 PM PDT by Lera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Learn how to properly divide The Word

Sure. From the folks who know how to do it, not the theological descendants of Simon Magus. Jesus gave the authority to the Church, not to every man who wanted to set up his own belief system. Paul was not kind to those who believed or taught another gospel.

Galatians 1: 6 5 6 I am amazed that you are so quickly forsaking the one who called you by (the) grace (of Christ) for a different gospel 7 (not that there is another). But there are some who are disturbing you and wish to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach (to you) a gospel other than the one that we preached to you, let that one be accursed! 7 9 As we have said before, and now I say again, if anyone preaches to you a gospel other than the one that you received, let that one be accursed!

Doesn't bode well for the children of the Reformation, does it? The ultimate end of the Reformation was the destruction of Christianity. We Christians are keeping it together (with His authority) and bringing the Gospel to the whole world - and Jesus will be with us always.

Matthew 28: 18 11 Then Jesus approached and said to them, "All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go, therefore, 12 and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. 13 And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age."

Jesus does not say that He will be with any Tom, Dick or Calvin that pulls his beliefs out of his navel each morning.

159 posted on 04/14/2011 4:03:12 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Odd. Your posts are full of 1) yourself and 2) how anti Catholic you are.

It's not odd you would see it that way considering you are a Catholic. Try and see the truth that seems to evade you.

IT'S ALL ABOUT JESUS! And JESUS is THE WORD and I'M PRO-WORD!


God's WORD is The FINAL Authority


Your posts indicate that you are more attached to handing out crosses than to carrying them. I also notice a singular paucity of Gospel in your prose - whereas we bring the Gospel to the heretic, the apostate, the pagan and the ungrateful. You're welcome.

You are mind reading and looking/reading with catholic eyes on a Christian post. That's your Rx for the day in your confusion. You're welcome - now pick up your cross and go send in a donation to FR for the help you just received.
160 posted on 04/14/2011 4:07:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 421-424 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson