I'd love to see you answer this rhetorical question of yours.
On second reading, I see even more on this post I'd like to comment on. You make it seem like it is an errant Catholic belief that Jesus is God. Then there's this line:
And Mary gave birth to Jesus and is rightly called the mother of Christ, then by Catholic reasoning, she is to be called the mother of God because Jesus the Christ is God.
I notice how you say it is right to call Mary the mother of Christ, but then say it is Catholic reasoning that she is to be called the mother of God because "Jesus the Christ" is God. Hmmm...
Let’s start a sidebar on how and when ignorance is culpable and when not. There’s a lot of willful ignorance and a lot of negligent ignorance among our interlocutors.
That is the most generous construction possible on their falsehoods.
No, Quix has already said just what I conjectured: any truth that might make for peace is to be avoided — because what really matters is enmity.
Let’s start a sidebar on how and when ignorance is culpable and when not. There’s a lot of willful ignorance and a lot of negligent ignorance among our interlocutors.
That is the most generous construction possible on their falsehoods.
No, Quix has already said just what I conjectured: any truth that might make for peace is to be avoided — because what really matters is enmity.