[metmom]

Quix- I’m thinking this goes a long ways to explaining the pedophile problem that exists amongst Romanists. If their theological language is coterminous with sexual language this association can lead to actions in which a person believes that the act in the natural sphere somehow relates to a theological goodness. This would be especially prevalent amongst those involved in priestcraft because they are always working in both spheres.

Aside from that, it reveals why there is no outrage from Catholics about their priest's behavior.

When someone has the base mentality that that kind of play on words is funny, then there's there's just that much less likelihood that they'll see anything wrong with impropriety when done by others.

The sheep will follow the shepherd.

[WPaCon]

Posts 1835, 1837 and 1870 are ridiculous and show the delusional ideas some people will talk themselves into believing about the Catholic Church.

[Quix]

YUP.

Given some of the get-ups they’ve posted of some of the participants in some of their services . . .

It’s clearly the blessings and mercy of God that they haven’t yet decided it was time to put on public demonstrations and lessons

in front of their altars to the stand-in-Ishtar Goddess of the Vatican Cult.

[presently no screen name]

Aside from that, it reveals why there is no outrage from Catholics about their priest's behavior.

Yes it does and considering the 'choice of the word for today and the 'trying' to defend it' - it seems many just came out of the confessional. They are taught to force themselves to obey their confessor. And then their smut comes here.

The apples don't fall from from the tree - and we are witnessing exactly what roams the halls of the Vatican/RCC . And a turnoff to anyone seeking God.

With the Vatican/RCC history - they could only entice those with low moral standards to join their organization. As we see, they cover it, enjoy it and defend it. And, yes, the sheep follow the shepherd.