I do not believe it is ever child's play to honor God by correctly attributing His works to Him correctly .or correctly honoring His attributes..
And if that's what you'd done, I wouldn't have called it sophistry. But, maybe through ellipsis or some other thing -- in any event not saying what you meant, both of these reek of sophistry.
I wonder if the diversity of humans and of loves is sufficiently acknowledged. To PRESUME to judge someone's devotion on how he answers, "Who/what is Jesus to you?" is, well, presumptuous IMHO. If I've just spoken for 45 minutes on the Trinity and the Hypostatic Union I might have an entirely different answer from what I'd have if I had been talking about the atonement.
The theological impossibility of an adequate statement beyond the reach of cavil on ANY important truth means that any short statement can be criticized -- while few will read a book long enough to be adequate.
Keep in mind
That IHS XP
Has died for us,
And is risen from the dead.
He is our saving Lord;
He is Joy for all ages.
If that's enough, why do we need a Bible? If it's not enough, can we ever have enough?
I recall, also, the little old ladies, mostly "charismatics" at a church I served who would come up to one and, as it were, shove a thermometer under one's tongue, take it out and decide if one was sufficient, all in a few minutes.
I tremble for their souls. The eagerness to judge is a problem.