Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I was already aware of those incidents, tragic as they were. Police have been discreetly discussing sensitive cases with officials for years. In the case of the A-J diocese, this goes back to the time of the late Bishop Hogan. Obviously the way in which the Church handles such cases today is different than what was done previously. I think both Hogan and Adamec were following the accepted procedures of their day, which differ from what is the current practice.
90 posted on 04/21/2011 6:40:56 AM PDT by rikkitt (in Bridgeport, CT diocese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: rikkitt
Police have been discreetly discussing sensitive cases with officials for years.

Right there is the problem. Why would police be "discreetly discussing sensitive cases with officials for years?"

When sexual abuse of children is suspected, arrests are made. Period.

Not so for the Roman Catholic church. It gets a pass.

Just what makes these cases "sensitive?" Because they involve a pederast priest? Why does it takes years? Why just "discussions?"

Twenty-seven priests suspended for suspected child sexual abuse in one diocese in one city.

That's the result of "discreetly discussing sensitive cases with officials for years."

Absolutely pathetic.

91 posted on 04/21/2011 7:47:52 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson