Sedevacantesism (he is not a pope because he teaches error)
is simplistic, and so perhaps he has convinced himself he's not a sede. After all, that's a hard thing to have to acknowledge. But someone who doesn't believe the pope is Catholic and won't acknowledge his validity shouldn't state that he's not a sede on his homepage.
thank you Lorica, please be part of the tar and feather crew next time he posts an incorrect, biased, wrongheaded article
that attacks our Beloved Church.
In St John Bosco’s famous tossing ships dream I can clearly see Verdugo and the company he keeps.
It appears that certain people now imagine themselves be reader of minds?
None of the persons calling me a sedevacantes even have a clue what a sedevacantes is. Abp. Lefebvre expelled 9 priests from the SSPX because they were sedevacantes. Those 9 were the beginning of the largest sedevacantes group in the world. I go to an SSPX chapel.
My FR profile says very clearly that I am not a sedevacantes. If I was a sedevacantes, do any of you think that I would lie about it? Do you think that I'm scared of ANYONE, or embarrassed to say the truth? Give me a break.
If the EWTN supporters don't have anything to offer in the arena of ideas to counter what the author or I posted on the thread, do yourselves a favor, and go study the faith. Character assassinations, I've seen, it's the modus operandi of the commies/liberals/progressivists/leftist I've been fighting for 30 years. It's not a Catholic technique of debate.
Catholics possess truth, the truth is easy to defend. If people have a hard time defending their position, it is likely that they do not possess the truth, or are just deficient in their knowledge of the faith.