Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Beeline
The people calling me all kinds of names for posting the constant teaching of the Church, have fallen into the same mistake as the sedevacantes, a conundrum (When Catholics who follow antiquity/tradition, do not even need step into debate on those two simplistic, false, conclusions.) Sedevacantesism (he is not a pope because he teaches error) or Papalolotry (he can't teach error because he is the pope).
42 posted on 04/08/2011 12:35:40 PM PDT by verdugo ("You can't lie, even to save the World")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: verdugo

I commend you for posting from tradition.

Now: do you consider Pope Benedict to be a VALID Pope? I don’t want to know if you ACKNOWLEDGE him to be the “reigning” Pope. Do you consider him to be a VALID Pope?

Is he your pope?

Unless you can answer both of these in the affirmative, you’re just spinning your wheels. There are plenty of tradition-minded Catholics at FR who, while disagreeing with the Pope, believe he is a valid Pope.

Please just answer the questions.


43 posted on 04/08/2011 12:37:58 PM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson