"Whiff, Whiff, and Whiff. Original post’s completely baseless slanderous allegations...remain completely baseless slanderous allegations, i.e.: they remain completely devoid of even the slightest attempt to provide sources (i.e. sources = articles that have actually been published (not something Joe Blow said), date of publication (the normal information that is expected from a source (If you are not familiar with this concept, you are in luck and in the right place - for further information simply see the instructions (and requirements) for posting real news articles here on Free Republic)) for any of the three specific incidents where President Hinckley is accused of lying...how many strikes do you usually get when u play?"
You are making a truth claim - that the post article is slanderous. Yet, you have offered nothing to demonstrate your claim is true. Do you have anything?
You keep using the "whiff" word. Do you realize you haven't left the dugout yet. You are content to sit there, spit tobacco juice and holler at the players...
Could not help but notice how gobbled their message was....a tactic often used is to use brackets with their own sound bite, or others, along with unnecessary babble nestled inbetween the point they are attempting to make. Saying something pointed and clear seems to evade them....and is the same with their teachings.