[Dr. Eckleburg]

Shhh...

Secret.

[lastchance]

Accused does not necessarily equal credible allegations. It is common practice for name of accused person who are not yet being investigated or who are under investigation, to remain confidential until results of an investigation are in.

The article does not bother to say when these accusations arose or how long ago the alleged crimes happened.

Once an investigation is complete by all parties having jurisdiction then by all means names should be made public. Notice too the article does not say the names are being withheld from law enforcement. As the names would also remain confidential while undergoing a criminal investigation.

That is how the law works.

[TSgt]

This must be part of their zero-tolerance policy. /SAR

[Dr. Scarpetta]

The Archdiocese of St. Paul has a list of 33 priests accused of sexually abusing minors. But, unlike a similar list of priests revealed this week by St. John's Abbey in Collegeville, the St. Paul priests will remain unnamed.

***

I believe the names and photos need to be released. Parents need to know who these people are so they can protect their children.

If you don't agree with me, please don't try to change my mind. I won't.

I am a grandmother of 2 toddlers, and I want information about clergy, teachers, and coaches accused of sexual crimes.