To: presently no screen name
Implying you were dishonest was too harsh and out of line. I apologize for my haste and my unfairness. I meant you were presenting my opinion in such a way (out of context and incomplete) that it actually appeared to contradict what I truly believe.
742 posted on
03/27/2011 11:48:05 PM PDT by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: lastchance
I meant you were presenting my opinion in such a way (out of context and incomplete) that it actually appeared to contradict what I truly believe.
You presented your own opinion, I didn't - I, merely, copied it and then presented my own opinion. When an opposing view is posted - do you expect it NOT to appear as a contradiction to your statements? What is it - you didn't want me to contradict your opinions but wanted me to agree with your view?
Nothing what taken out of context - what you read was my view which is different than yours.
It's not hard to refute... They are never concerned about sex abuse victims except for those who were victims of priests. They dont care about other institutions shuffling abusers and covering up abuse. They are not even willing to admit that perhaps in some instances false accusations have been made.The second is those rabid, vitrolic Protestants who hate Catholicism and Catholics. Guess who the group on FR are???
Your church failed in it's duties and it's everyone else's fault.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson