[count-your-change]

A complaint against the judge? For what? For telling everyone in court she had received a letter of unknown veracity? And pointing out the obvious? That the defence advocate cannot be both a witness and an advocate in the trial?

Maybe the defence is trying to lay a foundation for a mistrial if he is not allowed to do both.

Anyway, the trial will probably go forward despite all the whining about bias and anti-catholicism by the defence.

[muawiyah]

If the guy is a witness to a crime about to be tried in her court she needs to say so and be prepared to prove it ~ in a different trial.

She has referred to secret testimony (that letter which she did not let the lawyer read) as the basis for her acccusation that he's just a consiglieri ~ and he expressed anger ~ and that's not just because he has an Italian surname.

Hop hop!