To: metmom
Even if he didn’t know anyone who claimed to be abused, the fact that he attended the seminary should be enough to disqualify him for conflict of interest. One of the stupidest things I've ever read on here.
36 posted on
03/26/2011 1:51:05 PM PDT by
pgkdan
( "Wherever the Catholic sun doth shine / There's always laughter and good red wine / ...Belloc)
To: pgkdan; metmom
One of the stupidest things I've ever read on here. Really? So you think it's okay that a defense attorney attended the same seminary at the same time the accused sexual assaults were taking place, and thus could reasonably be called as a witness?
41 posted on
03/26/2011 1:59:47 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: pgkdan
“One of the stupidest things I’ve ever read on here.”
I’ve seen MUCH stupider.
Even on this thread.
47 posted on
03/26/2011 2:03:48 PM PDT by
WPaCon
(Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson