Replies

Your flawed contention that Catholicism supports Tradition against scripture is fantasy of the highest magnitude. It is the Church inspired by the Holy Spirit which complied scripture as we presently know it to be. Yet the sin of Pride does not allow for one to acknowledge this salient fact.

The exegesis provided in your post is seriously flawed. Your understanding of historical reality leaves much to be desired and will not serve you well in your final judgment. It will only provide eternal disaster with a burning taste in your mouth.

Your flawed contention that Catholicism supports Tradition against scripture is fantasy of the highest magnitude.

Then defend it instead of showing such implacable hatred.

1) I claim that Matthew 13:55 is correct, and that Jesus's brothers by His mother Mary were "James, Joses, Simon and Judas". Catholic Tradition is that Mary had no other children by Jesus.

2) You also need to defend the Ubi Primam of 1849 which states "For, God has committed to Mary... all salvation" which is on the Catholic Website http://www.ewtn.com/library/encyc/p9ubipr2.htm

3)I maintain that Salvation was accomplished by Christ Alone for His people, and that "all salvation" is certainly not committed to Mary. Therefore, which is correct, the Papal Doctrine or Scripture?

4)Also I would remind you that Mary in the Magnificat said "God my Savior". Thus Mary claimed to be a Sinner and that God was her Savior. Again, which is correct, Papal Doctrine or Scripture?

I would remind you that this is an International Forum and Decorum is advised if any are to accept what you believe.