Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
‘You mean hiding them and keeping them from people, refusing to allow any but selected individuals to read them.’

In the West nearly any person who could read could read the Vulgate Bible, since for most of the period Vulgate Latin was the only written language in Western Europe. The first appearances of proto-French and proto-German were in the Treaty of Verdun, written for Charlemagne's grandsons. There was no significant literature in these languages, or Anglo-Saxon or Welsh for well into the second millennium AD. At that time Italian WAS Vulgate Latin and Spain was essentially an islamic country. The problem was the absence of libraries and the high cost of buying a bible, since it involved thousands of hours of hand copying, not something your average shopkeeper could afford.

216 posted on 01/23/2011 2:42:47 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ('“Our own government has become our enemy' - Sheriff Paul Babeu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla; driftdiver

There were ‘English’ translations of part of the scripture long prior to Wycliffe. Since part COULD be translated, and WAS, what prevented the Catholic Church from translating ALL of it?

How did the Apostles know scripture, when many clergy of the 1300s did not?


232 posted on 01/23/2011 3:27:30 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

And since the Church wouldn’t allow the common person to learn latin it made it a tad difficult.


304 posted on 01/23/2011 5:32:02 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson