Well.., if we know a little of early church history, then we know that there was plenty of division and “heresy” before Rome became the vast autocratic org that it became, and unScripturally using the sword of men to defeat her theological enemies.
But what Rome does is offer a standard by which to judge truth by, yet in so doing it becomes like cults who effectively exalt a man or an office above the assuredly infallible Scriptures, but attributing assured infallibility to men or office. For according to their interpretation only their interpretation is right. And any single denomination could claim as much, and thus also define history accordingly. Consider what i say.
Now God could have always raised up a Moses (most meek man) whose authority was so supernatural attested to that there was little question that what he said as from God was indeed so, and Divine attestation is part of establishing truth, and the apostles had power; But not only did Moses’ words become the authority that was used to judged and establish further revelation, but the Lord commends those who (with right heart) sought to ascertain the veracity of apostolic teaching thereby.
And i would dare say that it is evangelical gospel that historically has overall most evidenced the most degree of the scriptural transformative power of God. But this does not excuse the divisional nature of Protestantism, yet it can be shown that RC’s have a freedom like unto SS type churches, except their religious life is more church based versus a scripture centered relationship with Christ, this being how the spiritual life of most Evangelicals began.
God provides enough grace to know the truth but its qualities and effects, to those who truly want Him, but not in such a way that men cannot rational it away, nor by making men become as God, warranting implicit trust, as Rome’s AIM does.
Sorry if this sound disjointed. Its late.
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2661829/posts?page=347#347
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2661829/posts?page=314#314
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2657209/posts?page=1670#1670
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2661829/posts?page=217#217
Is it honest to exaggerate the the divisions among protestants?
30,000 denominations????
Really?